This doesn’t sound like a solution. What if the build fails for some other reason, a change in an integration that is not reflected in the code, for example, and we have to rebuild 7 branches, which have failed? Rebuilding them is easy, and successful, but we have to go to each of them and create a new commit just for GH to see the change, really? Isn’t there a better way to integrate with Github’s checks system?
polida
4
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Github status checks | 4 | 2578 | September 26, 2020 | |
| Deleted Site Still Runs Check on Github, PRs blocked | 6 | 1277 | October 27, 2022 | |
| GitHub Commit Status for "deploy/netlify" doesn't report "successful" | 23 | 4724 | August 28, 2025 | |
| Disconnect between GitHub and Netlify with successful deploy hook | 3 | 830 | September 13, 2022 | |
| Hosted Netflify project is not updating despite pushing new commits to the GitHub repo | 11 | 711 | March 14, 2023 |